Over recent years, New Hampshire has made progress in recognizing substance use disorder as a chronic medical condition requiring care and support, rather than a criminal issue. Addressing substance misuse requires comprehensive, evidence-based treatment, access to behavioral health care, and supportive community health programs and services. Data shows that mandatory minimum sentencing is not effective in reducing substance use, overdose deaths, or substance-related arrests.1 Rather, these policies lead to higher rates of incarceration, at a higher cost to taxpayers, all while widening racial disparities within our criminal justice system.2 New Hampshire policies should focus on substance use treatment, prevention, and support rather than those that continue the cycle of criminalization and incarceration.
SB 14 and SB 15 propose mandatory minimum sentencing for some fentanyl and other drug-related offenses. Mandatory minimum sentences remove individuals from their communities, restrict access to needed treatment, and weaken our state's efforts to overcome the ongoing addiction crisis.
About the Bills
SB 14, as amended by the Senate, would require a minimum sentence of 3.5 to 7 years for some fentanyl-related offenses (learn more about SB 14). SB 15, as amended by the Senate, would require a minimum sentence of 10 years for the distribution of fentanyl that results in death (learn more about SB 15). These bills would cause further harm to individuals in need of treatment and would undermine the progress New Hampshire has made in increasing access to treatment for substance use disorder.
The Harms of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
Mandatory minimum sentences don't address the root causes of substance misuse but rather harm families, individuals, and communities. Mandatory minimums:
- Separate families and perpetuate trauma3
- Disproportionately affect marginalized communities and exacerbate cycles of poverty and criminalization4
- Fail to prevent future substance misuse and related arrests1
- Create barriers to treatment and recovery1
- Burden taxpayers with high incarceration costs2
A Better Path Forward
Research shows that every $1 invested in substance use treatment saves $4 in health care costs and $7 in law enforcement and other criminal justice costs.5 Our policies should continue to focus on addressing the root causes of substance misuse and developing effective, compassionate solutions that build resilient communities through evidence-based treatment, prevention programs, and support for all Granite Staters.
Take Action
Remote Sign-In (by midnight on 4/9)
Sign in remotely to the public hearings on SB 14 and SB 15 to show your opposition to mandatory minimum sentencing requirements.
Sign in to Oppose SB 14: Fentanyl-Related Offenses
- Go to the House Sign In Form on the GenCourt website.
- Fill in your personal information.
- Select the date: April 9
- Select the committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety
- Choose the bill number: SB 14
- Select "I am: A member of the public" unless one of the other labels is appropriate to you.
- Fill in "I'm Representing: Myself" unless you are approved to represent another entity (i.e. your workplace or an organization).
- Select "I OPPOSE this bill."
- Upload or write your written testimony (this step is optional; please note your testimony becomes immediately visible on the website to anyone).
- Click "Submit."
Sign in to Oppose SB 15: Distribution with Death Resulting
- Go to the House Sign In Form on the GenCourt website.
- Fill in your personal information.
- Select the date: April 9
- Select the committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety
- Choose the bill number: SB 15
- Select "I am: A member of the public" unless one of the other labels is appropriate to you.
- Fill in "I'm Representing: Myself" unless you are approved to represent another entity (i.e. your workplace or an organization).
- Select "I OPPOSE this bill."
- Upload or write your written testimony (this step is optional; please note your testimony becomes immediately visible on the website to anyone).
- Click "Submit."
Email the Committee
Take action by emailing members of the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee to urge them to vote against these mandatory minimum sentencing bills.
Bill Status
The House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee will hold a public hearing on SB 14 and SB 15 on Wednesday, April 9 at the Legislative Office Building in Room 202. SB 14 will be heard at 10 am and SB 15 at 10:30 am.
Bill Progress:
January 14: Public Hearing, Senate Judiciary Committee
January 30: Senate passed SB 14 (15-8) and SB 15 (14-9) with amendments. Both bills crossed over to the House of Representatives.
Next: Public Hearing, House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee - scheduled for Wednesday, April 9 at 10 am (SB 14) and 10:30 am (SB 15).
References:
- The Pew Charitable Trusts (2018, March). More Imprisonment Does Not Reduce State Drug Problems. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2018/03/more-imprisonment-does-not-reduce-state-drug-problems
- Butcher, F., Cissner, A. B., Rempel, M. (2022, December). When incarceration is automatic: mandatory minimums and race. Center for Justice Innovation. https://www.innovatingjustice.org/publications/minimums-race
Innovation. https://www.innovatingjustice.org/publications/minimums-race - Wang, L. (2022, August 11). Both sides of the bars: How mass incarceration punishes families. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2022/08/11/parental_incarceration
- Sentencing Reform. American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/issues/smart-justice/sentencing-reform. Accessed January 9, 2025.
- Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2012). Cost benefits of investing early in substance abuse treatment. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/Fact_Sheets/investing_in_treatment_5-23-12.pdf
